Re: 2.1.68+(well 75 at least?) routing, etc... reject

A.N.Kuznetsov (kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru)
Tue, 30 Dec 1997 22:34:28 +0300

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Anthony DeBoer: "Re: Filesystem optimization.. - why not optimise squid?"
Previous message: Manuel J. Galan: "OFFTOPIC kernel, Re: PPP broken sometime after 2.1.66? -> NO"
Maybe in reply to: Tuomas Heino: "2.1.68+(well 75 at least?) routing, etc... reject"

In article <Pine.LNX.3.91.971229222259.8805C-100000@xgw10.pal.xgw.fi> you wrote:
: That means 10.1.16.4 can do dns and some other stuff but it won't be able to do everything needed for http to work...
: The reject route to that external host (193.94.113.201) works well... I think ;)

What the problem do you see here? Seems, it works.

: Also if I delete reject routes the programs won't notice that before that "optimization" has "timed out"

What do you mean? What "optimization"? What timeout?

Alexey Kuznetsov

Next message: Anthony DeBoer: "Re: Filesystem optimization.. - why not optimise squid?"
Previous message: Manuel J. Galan: "OFFTOPIC kernel, Re: PPP broken sometime after 2.1.66? -> NO"
Maybe in reply to: Tuomas Heino: "2.1.68+(well 75 at least?) routing, etc... reject"