> > From rgb@phy.duke.edu Tue Nov 4 11:47:52 1997
> > On Mon, 3 Nov 1997, Mike Sharkey wrote:
> > > ... I have to ask myself why would many people want this? It seems
> > > easier and more reliable to just run win95 on another box joined to your
> > > linux box by ethernet...
>
> Not always convenient/affordable.
That is what I was trying to say. Thank you!
[stuff snipped]
>
> I like this idea. There's some scheme like this coming (here?) for
> OS/2 but I don't have the URL handy. It might be nice to have
> something like an incremental compile where the first time an app runs
> the system creates a translated executable as it goes, saving it for
> later runs.
Sounds like the FX!32 thing that NT alphas use to run x86 binaries.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mark Aitchison, \_ Phone: +64 3 364-2947 home 337-1225
> Dept of Physics & Astronomy, </ Fax: +64 3 364-2469 or 364-2999
> University of Canterbury, /) E-mail: phys169@csc.canterbury.ac.nz
> Christchurch, NEW ZEALAND. (/' www.phys.canterbury.ac.nz/~physmsa
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phil Brutsche
"Be of stout heart, Number One. We've handled the Borg. We can
certainly handle Admiral Jellico." - Jean-Luc Picard
----------------------------------------------------------------------