Re: Linux 2.0 and 2.1 stability..
Lauri Tischler (ltischler@efore.fi)
Fri, 31 Oct 1997 23:08:09 GMT +0200
Anno Domini 31 Oct 97 at 9:20, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> In short, it wasn't really worth even fixing, looking back at the problems
> that fix then caused. A 2.0.32 with the memory leak would not be a
> disaster.
Maybe I'm making myself an asshole once again, but isn't it a bit
arrogant to say that memory leak (any memory leak) is not worth of
fixing? How do you classify 'non-disastrous' leak ?
Cheers..