Re: Is pre-patch-2.0.31-10 the same as pre-patch-2.0.31-9 +

Franz Sirl (Franz.Sirl@munich.netsurf.de)
Fri, 26 Sep 1997 15:40:01 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Bill Hawes: "Re: Problems compiling 2.1.57.. solutions anyone?"
Previous message: Dr. Werner Fink: "Re: Real pre-10 krash boom bang."
In reply to: Mark Hemment: "Re: mmap() + write() bug"
Next in thread: Mike Kilburn: "Re: Is pre-patch-2.0.31-10 the same as pre-patch-2.0.31-9 + p10-2?"

At 13:10 26.09.97 +0200, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
>
>> I noticed today that there is now a pre-patch-2.0.31-10.gz on the kernel
>> ftp site (ftp.kernel.org). Is this the same as pre-patch-2.0.31-9.gz
>> plus the p10-2.gz or are there more fixes in it?
>>
>
>Naa ... you need exactly:
>
> linux-pre-2.0.31-9.tar.gz and patch-2.0.31-pre9-pre10.gz
>
>
>or
>
> linux-2.0.31.tar.gz, pre-patch-2.0.31-9.gz (don't forget to run
> `make mproper') and patch-2.0.31-pre9-pre10.gz
>
>
>Note: patch-2.0.31-pre9-pre10.gz is NOT exactly the same as p10-2.gz

pre10 == pre9 + p10-2 + (buffer-Sep16 - (one save_flags in kmalloc)) +
scsi_module-fix

;-))

Ciao,
Franz.

Next message: Bill Hawes: "Re: Problems compiling 2.1.57.. solutions anyone?"
Previous message: Dr. Werner Fink: "Re: Real pre-10 krash boom bang."
In reply to: Mark Hemment: "Re: mmap() + write() bug"
Next in thread: Mike Kilburn: "Re: Is pre-patch-2.0.31-10 the same as pre-patch-2.0.31-9 + p10-2?"