Win/NT SMP sucks. C't (a german magazine tested SMP boxes) found, that
it doesn't scale very much, because it seems that interrupts are done
only on one processor. Linux 2.0/SMP sucks probably even more :(, as it
has a global spin lock :(((((
I was under the impression (from reading on the smp list) that NT 4.0 spread
the interrupts over the CPU's?
I was meaning to ask... Does Linux do this for all architectures? (I quick
look to me and it looks like interrupts on the x86 are handled by only one
processor?)
-Chris
P.S. /proc/interrupts would be much kewler if the information was per cpu.