Re: [OFFTOPIC] US Encryption Rules Rejected

James Mastros (root@jennifer-unix.dyn.ml.org)
Tue, 26 Aug 1997 22:49:07 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Matthias Urlichs: "Re: attempt to re-implement sillyrename for NFS in 2.1.*"
Previous message: Henner Eisen: "struct socket: wait_queue field obsolete in 2.1.51?"
In reply to: Scott K. Ellis: "2.1.51 and UMSDOS failed compile"

Hate to enlongate an off-topic thread, but...
This dosn't mean that the federal goverment is being a not-stupid, just that
one judge is.
Oh well, it's a start, atleast.
-=- James Mastros

On Tue, 26 Aug 1997, Mailing List Reader wrote:
> >From another list I am on... looks like the U.S. may finally start not
> being stupid on encryption....
> (we may even be able to have crypto in the kernel distibution soon...)
>
> Encryption rules rejected
>
> Judge says federal regulations barring
> unlicensed exports unconstitutional
>
> August 26, 1997: 6:15 a.m. ET

Next message: Matthias Urlichs: "Re: attempt to re-implement sillyrename for NFS in 2.1.*"
Previous message: Henner Eisen: "struct socket: wait_queue field obsolete in 2.1.51?"
In reply to: Scott K. Ellis: "2.1.51 and UMSDOS failed compile"