Re: Any reason 128MB is not picked up?

david parsons (o.r.c@p.e.l.l.p.o.r.t.l.a.n.d.o.r.u.s)
5 Aug 1997 09:15:19 -0700

In article <>,
Dale Amon as Operator <> wrote:
>Does the kernel support more than 64MB?

Yes, with either later 2.1.x kernels, a patch, or a lilo.conf hack.

There are patches to do enhanced memory detection for 2.0.30 on
either or
(I don't know the exact page); these are the memory patches that
Larry Augustine and I created.

david parsons \bi/ Hardwiring memory sizes is for the birds.

We have a couple
>machines with 128MB and I'd not clicked on until just
>now when checking out a new server that although the bios
>shows the proper number on boot, if you later look in
>/proc/meminfo you only see 64M.
>2.0.28 and 2.0.29 and 2.0.30.
>I'm not all that familiar with Intel, I'm mostly a 68K NeXT