Re: OOPs with 2.0.30!

Eloy A. Paris (eparis@ven.ra.rockwell.com)
5 Aug 1997 14:59:58 GMT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Eirik Mikkelsen: "Re: Any reason 128MB is not picked up?"
Previous message: Robert L Harris: "Re: Any reason 128MB is not picked up?"
Maybe in reply to: Sachin Garg: "OOPs with 2.0.30!"

Sachin Garg <sachin@cdacb.ernet.in> wrote:

: I got this message on my machine, a P100 with 16 MB running linux 2.0.30
: (2.0.29 patched to 2.0.20). Motherboard is Intel Advanced ML/ATX.

: I was running an rlogin session and checking my mail on the remote
: machine. At that time a few xterm and rxvt sessions and 2 netscape
: sessions were also open.

It looks like a lot of heavy processes for just 16 MBytes of RAM...

E.-

Next message: Eirik Mikkelsen: "Re: Any reason 128MB is not picked up?"
Previous message: Robert L Harris: "Re: Any reason 128MB is not picked up?"
Maybe in reply to: Sachin Garg: "OOPs with 2.0.30!"