Half a digest?

Glenn Bily (gbily@bellatlantic.net)
Sat, 26 Jul 1997 22:42:51 -0400 (EDT)

Attn: List maintainer:

Seems that I got 2 halves of a digest and apparently something missing
out of the middle....anybody else get this? I recall a past message
about some rogue L*tus N*tes server spewing....is this related?

One coming from where it was suppose to with no tailer and one
apparently coming from the digest because of the message tail but with
an improper return address.

Here are the mail headers:

First the one with the properly formed return address:

Return-Path: <owner-linux-kernel-digest-outgoing@vger.rutgers.edu>
Received: from postoffice.bellatlantic.net ([])
by postoffice2.bellatlantic.net (post.office MTA v2.0 0813
ID# 0-11699) with ESMTP id AAA23709 for <gbily@bellatlantic.net>;
Sat, 26 Jul 1997 21:49:01 -0400
Received: from pmdfsrv.bellatlantic.net ([])
by postoffice.bellatlantic.net (Post.Office MTA v3.1
release PO203a ID# 0-36903U31000L2S100) with ESMTP id AAA29942
for <gbily@bellatlantic.net>; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 21:54:34 -0400
Received: from mail7.bellatlantic.net ([])
by pmdfsrv.bellatlantic.net (Post.Office MTA v3.1 release PO203a
ID# 0-0U10L2S100) with ESMTP id AAA18909
for <gbily@bellatlantic.net>; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 21:47:06 -0400
Received: from nic.funet.fi (nic.funet.fi [])
by mail7.bellatlantic.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP
id UAA12306 for <gbily@bellatlantic.net>; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 20:46:09
-0500 (EST)
Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([] EHLO vger.rutgers.edu
ident: root [port 20548]) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id <2718-3759>;
Sun, 27 Jul 1997 04:48:34 +0300
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <971160-8839>; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 21:40:53 -0400
Errors-To: owner-linux-kernel-digest@vger.rutgers.edu
Precedence: bulk
Message-Id: <19970727014053Z971160-8839+5471@vger.rutgers.edu>

From: owner-linux-kernel-digest@vger.rutgers.edu
To: linux-kernel-digest@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: linux-kernel-digest V1 #1031
Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 21:40:41 -0400

<blah blah blah and then>

From: colin@nyx.net (Colin Plumb)
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 97 14:15:59 MDT
Subject: Re: patch for fs/buffer.c get_unused_buffer_head

(End of message no tailer and incomplete message)

Then the second message:

Return-Path: <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu>
Return-Path: <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu>
Received: from jenolan.rutgers.edu by nyx.net (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA13969; Sat, 26 Jul 97 13:59:22 MDT
Received: (from davem@localhost)
by jenolan.rutgers.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA04521;
Sat, 26 Jul 1997 16:00:23 -0400
Message-Id: <199707262000.QAA04521@jenolan.rutgers.edu>
In-Reply-To: <9707261949.AA13637@nyx.net> (colin@nyx.net)
Status: R

Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 16:00:23 -0400
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu>
To: colin@nyx.net
Cc: whawes@star.net, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: patch for fs/buffer.c get_unused_buffer_head

[ blah blah blah and the tailer appears]


End of linux-kernel-digest V1 #1031

[blah blah blah]