david parsons wrote: > > In article <linux.kernel.19970719154232.50639@msu.edu>, > Aaron Tiensivu <tiensivu@pilot.msu.edu> wrote: > > > >I want to keep the notion of CONFIG_xx86 in the configure >scripts/etc, but > >I'm kind of lost in respect to what to call the Pentium II. > > > >CONFIG_M786? > > No, Intel already has an 80786; it's the graphics processor chip >that > was introduced at the same time as the 80386. > > What's the model number of the `pentium 2'; isn't it something like > the 80522? (the `pentium pro' is the 80521, and the `pentium' is > the 8050x {I think the 60/66 are 80501, while the cleaned up later > generation is 80502} > > Of course many brains would pop if the config scripts were reworked > to define CONFIG_M50x and CONFIG_M52x...
or even use Intel's CPUID levels for CONFIG_Mxxxx