Linux wolverine 2.0.30 #7 Sat Jun 14 00:04:49 EDT 1997 i586
- Jared
Michael Scott Shappe boldly claimed:
> > Yes, we need it. Really, world needs stable Linux kernel. 2.0.30 isn't.
>
> Perhaps it isn't for you. In which case perhaps you should be trying, as
> so many other have said, one of the EARLIER kernels, like 2.0.29.
>
> Better yet, report your problems so they can get fixed, instead of simply
> complaining about instability and hoping that the next rev will fix it.
>
> I run 2.0.30 on two different machines -- a Hewlett Packard Vextra XU
> 6/200 (PPro 200mhz) and a Fujitsu Lifebook 420D (Pentium 120mhz). The
> former is up almost constantly, and gets anywhere from 8 to 15 hours per
> day of workstation use; this machine has crashed once -- count it, once --
> in the last two months. The latter is on-and-off more often (it's a
> personal notebook machine), but has yet to crash on me even once.
>
> --
> Michael Scott Shappe <mshapp19@idt.net>
> Web: <http://www.publiccom.com/web/mikey/>
> Addicting the unsuspecting to the net since 1987
>
-- ----------------- jared@puck.nether.net - Nether Network ------------------ For a good time, look at http://www.izzy.net/~janc/tour/ For a worse time, look at http://puck.nether.net/