Re: 2.1.44

Christoph Lameter (clameter@miriam.fuller.edu)
Tue, 8 Jul 1997 10:03:19 -0700

Something like that has happened in the past. Lets move on and release 2.1.45
which will be better. I think it would be good to get rid of the pre-patches.
Lets have daily releases again like we had before. This is test code. Out with it
so that it can be tested.

In article <199707081430.PAA23794@snowcrash.cymru.net> you wrote:

: 2.1.44pre3 wasnt bad - in fact its been the best for a while. 2.1.44 is
: a bit of a disaster. It doesnt boot, and on the odd combination of settings
: that do boot it scrambles your disk

: The responsible thing to do would surely to be to rename it 2.1.44pre4 before
: it does further needless damage. I've no problem with 2.1.x having odd suprises
: like sometimes eating bits of disks - it is test code, but now we know its
: extremely dangerous moving it from the normal place would be smart.

: Alan

-- 
--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
Please always CC me when replying to posts on mailing lists.