try the same on signals.c, it fails with similar asm problems.
Are we depending on internals of gcc or something?
BTW, the -V2.7.2 -m486 is there because I have pgcc as my default
compiler...
Is this a gcc bug or a binutils or what? It's not a major problem
since it compiles correctly when I don't have the CFLAGS screwed up. ;-)
but I think it should be noted... these may be compiled w/o optimizations
for some ungodly reason (debugging? checking the difference gcc opts
make?)
The kernel seems to compile correctly under pgcc (970404) ... anyone else
tried that? Or am I the only one crazy enough to compound development
kernels with development compilers? (heh)
--Dan