Re: [Crypto] Re: ftp.kernel.org vs. ftp.funet.fi (fwd)

Matthias Urlichs (smurf@work.smurf.noris.de)
23 Apr 1997 13:19:21 +0200


Jim Nance <jlnance@avanticorp.com> writes:
> > In article <199704190944.FAA04829@jenolan.caipgeneral> you write:
> > > Won't work, there are laws that say it is also illegal to export
> > > anything which "allows non-exportable crypto to be plugged in
> > > easily".
> >
> > Then does this apply to the loopback device? It has hooks for
> > encryption where you can semi-easily (some source tweaking necessary)
> > plug in a DES module.
>
That's not a problem. Thee hooks are not for encryprion, they're for
plugging in *whatever*. You simply supply an instance of whatever that's
not encryprion and don't mention encryption in your documentation at all.

-- 
Beam me out of here, Scotty; I appear to be trapped in a computer.
-- 
Matthias Urlichs         \  noris network GmbH  /  Xlink-POP Nürnberg 
Schleiermacherstraße 12   \   Linux+Internet   /   EMail: urlichs@noris.de
90491 Nürnberg (Germany)   \    Consulting+Programming+Networking+etc'ing
   PGP: 1024/4F578875   1B 89 E2 1C 43 EA 80 44  15 D2 29 CF C6 C7 E0 DE
       Click <A HREF="http://info.noris.de/~smurf/finger">here</A>.    42