Re: procfs problems

Michiel Boland (boland@diva.nl)
Wed, 16 Apr 1997 10:09:20 +0200 (MEST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael Neuffer: "Re: Linux on PA/RISC"
Previous message: Mike Jagdis: "Re: why do we put code onto the stack when doing a signal?"

At the risk of getting my head sawn off,
has noone thought about extending the sysctl() mechanism
instead of all this fs nonsense?

Michiel

Next message: Michael Neuffer: "Re: Linux on PA/RISC"
Previous message: Mike Jagdis: "Re: why do we put code onto the stack when doing a signal?"