Re: UNIX: The Experiment That Failed

bofh@snoopy.virtual.net.au
Mon, 14 Apr 97 17:53:18 +1100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Gerard Roudier: "Re: Re[2]: Kernel testing"
Previous message: Vladimir Mott: "UNIX: The Experiment That Failed"
In reply to: Bernd Schmidt: "Re: 2nd Linux kernel patch to remove stack exec"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: 2nd Linux kernel patch to remove stack exec"

> >Even better, telnet to it and find out the O/S that it is running.
>Isn't
> >IRIX a version of UNIX. :-)

> It didn't accept telnet connections when I tried it. The SMTP
> port indicated Exchange 5.0, and the web server is IIS 3.0
> according to netsite.

>webx.best.com, which I believe is where this virtual host is pointing to,
>is well known to be using IRIX on their high end servers.

Best may be using IRIX on their high end servers, but the machine www.danger.net appears to all my tests to be an NT machine.

Russell Coker

Next message: Gerard Roudier: "Re: Re[2]: Kernel testing"
Previous message: Vladimir Mott: "UNIX: The Experiment That Failed"
In reply to: Bernd Schmidt: "Re: 2nd Linux kernel patch to remove stack exec"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: 2nd Linux kernel patch to remove stack exec"