Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before? (fwd)

mdean (mdean@best.com)
Wed, 26 Mar 1997 00:47:50 -0800 (PST)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 00:05:42 -0800 (PST)
From: David Parsons <orc@pell.chi.il.us>
To: mdean <mdean@best.com>
Subject: Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?

Please don't send me "courtesy copies" of email you're posting to the kernel
mailing list.

mdean wrote:
>
>
>
> I don't care about graphical boot sequences (like a 3d Rendered Pengiun
> shoveling Linux Snow into my machine). But you guys need to acknowledge
> the following when it comes to portability / flexibility/ speed
>
>
> in modern day:
>
> more flexibility equals less speed
> more speed equals less flexibility
>
> and in the future we have:
>
> more speed because of HARDWARE ENGINEERS
> which we can use to due a 3D gui with penguins playing pool on
> startup --- or for real purposes.
>
> the trick is:
>
> the HARDWARE people should be following the SOFTWARE people around
> not the other way because eventually I believe that hardware and software
> will be ONE.
>
> J. Weatherbee
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 25 Mar 1997, J. Sean Connell wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 25 Mar 1997, Klaus Lichtenwalder wrote:
> >
> > > [thoughts and comments on graphical boot sequences deleted]
> >
> > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH.
> >
> > LET THIS THREAD DIE!
> >
> > We discussed this to death five months ago, just before 2.0 came out. Someone
> > made a patch to display a penguin. I know that some of you are diametrically
> > opposed to a GUI boot sequence. I also know that some of you are
> > diametrically opposed to a text boot sequence.
> >
> > GET OVER IT!
> >
> > If I remember the upshot of the discussion the most recent time this has come
> > up, there ain't no way on this Earth that a GUI boot sequence is going to make
> > it into the mainstream Linux kernel, no matter how loudly you may clamor for
> > it. That's the beauty of Linux; if you don't like it, you can lump it, or you
> > can change it to suit your needs/wants/tastes.
> >
> > This particular tangent got us nowhere fast last time except for (indubitably)
> > lots of people mass-unsubscribing from linux-kernel simply to get away from
> > the damned spam.
> >
> > If it weren't for the fact that it'd kill the legitimate discussion I'd like
> > to follow, I'd killfile this subject now and forever (or until the next time
> > it comes up, probably just before Linux {2.2,3.0}? comes out.
> >
> > --
> > Jeffrey Connell | Systems Adminstrator, ICONZ
> > ankh@canuck.gen.nz | Any opinions stated above are not my employers',
> > ankh@iconz.co.nz | not my boyfriend's, my priest's, my God's, my
> > #include <stddisc.h> | my friends', and probably not even my own.
> > ---------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
> > Fingerprint: 1024/2B8B116D | Key at http://www.canuck.gen.nz/~ankh/pgpkey.html
> >
> >
>
>