Starting USB support for Linux

Inaky Perez Gonzalez (papyrus.hamburg.com!papyrus.hamburg.com!ad@ppp.net)
Mon, 10 Feb 1997 12:59:32 -0500



(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #4) id m0vtyUu-000FnvC; Mon, 10 Feb 97 17:22 MET
Received: (from ad@localhost) by lx2.noname (8.7.5/8.6.12) id RAA00023; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 17:22:27 +0100
To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: Process 1, ppid != 0
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.90)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Andreas Degert <ad@papyrus.hamburg.com>
Date: 10 Feb 1997 17:22:27 +0100
In-Reply-To: owner-linux-kernel-digest@vger.rutgers.edu's message of Mon, 10 Feb 1997 06:22:33 -0500
Message-ID: <x1hgjkvdfg.fsf@lx2.noname>
Lines: 22
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.25/XEmacs 19.14

Chris Wedgwood <chris@cyphercom.com> writes:

>
> Something odd just happened. I typed 'pstree -up' and was given what looked
> like a 'recursive tree'.
>
> Anyhow, I checked and for some reason, process 1 (init) thinks its ppid is 1
> (itself). I've never seen this before.
>
> This occurred under Linux 2.0.29. I have another 2.0.29 box which doesn't do
> this. (ie. the ppid for process 1 is 0).
>
> Any ideas?

I had exactly the same thing (init suddenly has ppid 1) some weeks ago,
on one of our servers running 2.0.27 or 2.0.28 (i don't remember exactly).
I filed it under "mysterious hardware problems etc.", because it did never
happen before or after that. The system didn't get unstable, but i got a
lot of mail from a cron-job that used pstree (endless recursion), so i had
to start it again.

Now it seems more like a bug that's triggered very seldom?