Version bug in 2.0.29?

Peter Grace (kidmagic@insa.NWS.NET)
Sat, 8 Feb 1997 10:47:10 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: shendrix@escape.widomaker.com: "Re: [masq] 1st virus in Linux :( (fwd)"
Previous message: Nathan Bryant: "Re: [masq] 1st virus in Linux :( (fwd)"
Next in thread: W. Reilly Cooley: "Re: Version bug in 2.0.29?"
Maybe reply: W. Reilly Cooley: "Re: Version bug in 2.0.29?"

I installed 2.0.29 last night.. apon returning to the machine this morning
and rebooting, I found it to still be 2.0.28. I remember doing everything
right, unzipping it, checking all symlinks, everything. I decided to
check the version.h in /usr/src/linux/include/linux, and it still said it
was 2.0.28.... This startled me incredibly, and I was wondering if its a
bug in the kernel, or was it just something I've done?

kidmagic@insa.nws.net

Next message: shendrix@escape.widomaker.com: "Re: [masq] 1st virus in Linux :( (fwd)"
Previous message: Nathan Bryant: "Re: [masq] 1st virus in Linux :( (fwd)"
Next in thread: W. Reilly Cooley: "Re: Version bug in 2.0.29?"
Maybe reply: W. Reilly Cooley: "Re: Version bug in 2.0.29?"