> giving the result in /var/adm/syslog:
>
> process 0 down
> process 0 got device
> process 1 down
> process 0 up
> process 0 down
> process 0 got device
>
> while what is expected on the last line is "precess 1 got device" because
> precess 1 did the down before process 0 did it the second time.
Don't confuse the ordering of your messages in the syslog with the
actual execution sequence. AFAIK, the relationship between the two will
not be deterministic.
Steve