Re: getting Linux into business..

Rob McKee (Imcom@imcom.com)
Tue, 20 Aug 1996 09:39:21 -0700 (PDT)

On Sun, 18 Aug 1996, Bryn Paul Arnold Jones wrote:

> You don't seem to understand, fork() _IS_ clone(0), not equilivent to, not
> like, but IS. I don't see any point in doing fork() based threads now,
> and clone based later, just get the clone stuff done. We could (should
> IMHO) remove fork(2), and implement fork(3).

alright.. howabout getting a clone(0,COPYVM|SIGCLD) threads lib going
first and then finish up a clone(astackptr,SIGCLD) threads lib down the
road..

--
#         Rob McKee                      ImCom.Com       207.33.73.2
#         SysAdmin                       1630 N. Main St. Suite #444
#         Imagine Communications         Walnut Creek, CA 94596-4609
#
#         (510) 939-1691 BBS                    (510) 939-1684 Voice
#         The best defense is not to have a hay seed for a president