Re: AFS (Alternate solutions (Was: Re: NFS still has caching

Shinanyaku (shin@binary9.net)
Thu, 18 Jul 1996 19:18:47 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: John Vozza: "Invalid operand: 0000 Please help!"
Previous message: Andrew E. Mileski: "Re: Linux 2.0.4 (and a small patch, d*mn)"
In reply to: Chai Harjo: "Re: AFS (Alternate solutions (Was: Re: NFS still has caching"

Chai Harjo was heard saying ....
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> At 09:47 AM 7/18/96 -0500, you wrote:
> >>>>>> "CH" == Chai Harjo <h9304021@student.anu.edu.au> writes:
> >
> > CH> Why don't you try AFS (Andrew File System)?
> >
> >Hey, even cooler would be work on creating freely-available[1] DFS and
> >DCE clients and servers. I wonder if OSF has pubished the specs to
> >either yet?
>
> I second this one.
> Why not start with ext3fs??
> Let's start the wish list for ext3fs.
> My wish list :
> 1. Scaleability
> 2. Single source image
> 3. Caching
> 4. Data replication
> 5. Security
> 6. Backup

7. Compression (by inode with inheritence).

Shin!
__________________________________________________________________________
Another Mailing List personality of Nicholas J. Leon shin@binary9.net

[ http://www.binary9.net/nicholas/ ]

Next message: John Vozza: "Invalid operand: 0000 Please help!"
Previous message: Andrew E. Mileski: "Re: Linux 2.0.4 (and a small patch, d*mn)"
In reply to: Chai Harjo: "Re: AFS (Alternate solutions (Was: Re: NFS still has caching"