Re: real kernel bloat
Alex Krimkevich (msmith@quix.robins.af.mil)
Tue, 25 Jun 1996 14:38:07 -0400 (EDT)
> I have a hard time believing it as well. You are correct in saying
> it is fat, probably this is the problem. At least in my experience
> with Solaris, it requires 24 meg of RAM to run with Linux on 16
> with X and still doesn't seem as fast.
>
> Check out:
>
> http://www.base.com/gordoni/os-sizes.html
>
> You may not have such a hard time believing it after reading that.
I meant I had a hard time believing his AlphaStation was as cruddy
as he said it was. I already know about FAT OSes. :)
Melvin