Re: patch-pre2.0.11 small patchfile problem?
Aaron Ucko (UCKO@vax1.rockhurst.edu)
Mon, 03 Jun 1996 11:28:03 -0600 (CST)
>|diff -u --recursive --new-file pre2.0.10/linux/drivers/sound/Config.in
>linux/drivers/sound/Config.in
>|--- pre2.0.10/linux/drivers/sound/Config.in Fri Apr 12 15:52:02 1996
>|+++ linux/drivers/sound/Config.in Mon Jun 3 16:19:44 1996
>--------------------------
>Patching file linux/drivers/sound/Config.in using Plan A...
>Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y]
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>is this a problem, or should i ignore it? I have sound support included
>the rest of the patch was ok ... strange
Ignore it. All it means is that you have been using the integrated
kernel-style sound configuration script instead of Hannu's separate
program.
-- Aaron Ucko (ucko@vax1.rockhurst.edu; finger for PGP public key) | httyp!
"That's right," he said. "We're philosophers. We think, therefore we am."
-- Terry Pratchett, _Small Gods_ | Geek Code 3.1 [for explanation, finger
hayden@mankato.msus.edu]: GCS/M/S/C d- s: a18 C++(+++)>++++ UL++>++++ P++
L++>+++++ E- W(-) N++(+) o+ K- w--- O M@ V-(--) PS++(+++) PE- Y(+) PGP(+) t(+)
!5 X-- R(-) tv-@ b++(+++) DI+ !D-- G++(+++) e->+++++(*) h!>+ r-(--)>+++ y?