Re: linux/net/core should be renamed

Ulrich Windl (Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de)
Fri, 12 Apr 1996 13:37:55 +0100


On 12 Apr 96 at 2:31, jerijian@seas.ucla.edu wrote:

> A warning to all: this is a religious topic.
>
> I believe that the linux/net/core directory in the Linux
> kernel source tree should be renamed to something else, in case
> make or gcc decides to segfault in that directory and try to
> produce a "core" (!) file.

CVS makes trouble, too (by default).
> (Still, doesn't this imply having a LARGE patch just
> to move the files to a dir. with a different name? I wonder...)
>
> --
> Arthur D. Jerijian \ The opinions expressed in this message are mine
> One man, one sinner \ only, and not UCLA's.
> jerijian@seas.ucla.edu \ Go Wolves! http://coke.physics.ucla.edu/
> adj@ucla.edu \ laptag/VanNuys.dir/vnhs.html
>
>