> On Wed, 10 Apr 1996, Marek Michalkiewicz wrote:
>
> > lilo:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 10 Apr 1996 Mills@huey.udel.edu wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ulrich,
> > > >
> > > > As far as I know, Linux has not upgraded the kernel to the current
> > > > spec. The interface is not compatible with the current xntpd....
> > >
> > > That would certainly explain what I've seen. Thank you for the input! :)
> >
> > Just curious: is anyone working on upgrading the kernel PLL to the
> > current xntpd spec? Preferably, before 1.4/2.0 is released...
>
> All the comments on the list so far have been problem reports, doesn't sound
> like anyone is. Mr. Mills is the author, but lord knows xntpd has been
> ported to a lot of systems, and I'm sure his time is taken up with stuff
> relating to his own environment.... ;)
Just to avoid confusion: Dr. Mills created xntp, and the reference
clock model, as well as an implementation. That's why his copyright
is there, but he did not write the Linux-specific code. I guess it's
up to the people at Erlangen, Germany (mskuhn, Torsten Duwe), because
they hav experience with that (I blindly assume).
>
> I might take a look at it if I get a chance, after the rent gets paid.... :)
>
>
> lilo
Ulrich