Re: Kernel functionality in user land

fuZZy (
Thu, 4 Apr 1996 05:20:02 -0500 (EST)

> > 3.) Communication should always (no matter if internal or external) go over
> > the kerneld message queue (Is the overhead bearable for internal
> > communication? Is the kerneld message queue concept powerful enough? Can
> > the kerneld message queue be used for inside-kernel communication?)
> > This would give us much common code between internal and external
> > features.

isn't this more what the kernel network link was written for?

		-fuZZy, paramour to the lady mindy

<did they buy it?> <I don't think they bought it.> <of course they bought it.> <shush, they're looking this way, remember to keep a straight face...>