RE: scrollback and VT switching

Bryn Paul Arnold Jones (bpaj@gytha.demon.co.uk)
Sat, 16 Mar 1996 13:25:16 +0000 (GMT)


On 15 Mar 1996 Ray_Van_Tassle-CRV004@email.mot.com wrote:

>
> > On Tue, 12 Mar 1996, Thomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= wrote:
> >
> > > After switching from the current VT to another one and back, scrollback
> > > no longer works for the original VT. Is this a bug or a feature? :-)
> > >
> > One thing it is, is annoying, but it's the same here. Sometimes I wish
> > that even just the stuff that had scrolled since I switched away was
> > kept, to a limit, or every thing to a limit, say 128 lines (ie on a 25x80
> > dislpay, just over 100 lines of garanteed (sp?) scrollback). I think that
>
> > it may cause more problems for VT switching, but it would be nice ....
> > Bryn
> > --
> Here we go again---whine, whine, whine.
> Why, oh, WHY, do people REFUSE to understand that systems are designed for
> the convenience of the coders, and not users.
>
> :)
>
I don't see that it would be hard, call the screen memory 128 lines long,
and insted of sticking the start of the screen at the top of memory, it
goes at line 103. In effect we are just preloading the scroll back. Oh,
and this is a coder convenience, you can look back for error messages
thFrom owner-linux-kernel-outgoing@vger.rutgers.edu Sat Mar 16 16:36:39 1996
Received: from orchard.washtenaw.cc.mi.us (orchard.washtenaw.cc.mi.us [198.111.176.4]) by herbie.ucs.indiana.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA18640 for <linuxkernel@herbie.ucs.indiana.edu>; Sat, 16 Mar 1996 16:36:38 -0500
Received: from vger.rutgers.edu by orchard.washtenaw.cc.mi.us (8.6.10/2.3)
with ESMTP id QAA21439; Sat, 16 Mar 1996 16:27:26 -0500
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <105605-27144>; Sat, 16 Mar 1996 16:22:07 -0500
Message-Id: <199603162123.CAA01375@kailash.cse.iitb.ernet.in>
To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Math Coprocessor !
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 02:53:41 +0530
From: Amitay B Isaacs <amitay@cse.iitb.ernet.in>
Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
Precedence: bulk

After applying the patches 74 and 75 the kernel does not set the math
coprocessor properly. It gives following message.

Checking 386/387 coupling... 387 failed: trying to reset

While 1.3.72 does not give any problem, report normal ! (no info on 73)

Checking 386/387 coupling... Ok, fpu using old IRQ13 error reporting

Is it related to the changes in the interrupt handler code ?

AMitay.

--- Heaven is not a place or it is not a time. Heaven is being perfect. ---