> Received: from nic.funet.fi (nic.funet.fi [128.214.248.6]) by mail.compulink.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA13443 for <lists@mayday.compulink.co.uk>; Fri, 8 Mar 1996 17:03:02 GMT
> From: lilo <lilo@lions.reseq.ungov>
> Reply-To: lilo <TaRDiS@mail.utexas.edu>
> To: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
> Subject: Re: (EMail addresses
> On Wed, 6 Mar 1996, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>
> > I usually reply directly, but I couldn't. I'd strongly encourage
> > everybody to use valid EMail envelopes (headers):
> > ------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
> > Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 15:40:47 +0100
> > Reply-to: postmaster@listserv.gmd.de
> > From: "LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a" <postmaster@listserv.gmd.de>
>
> Sorry. Apparently my reply-to didn't/doesn't survive this mailing list
> processor.
Well, it got here (eventually!) so it doesn't look like it's vger that's
the problem (or nic.funet.fi for that matter)
> lilo
-- Rob. (Robert de Bath <robert@mayday.compulink.co.uk>)