On Tue, 5 Mar 1996, Bryn Paul Arnold Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 1996, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > : > Alan
> > : >
> > : Well maybe you can summerise the outcome of the last 'descussion' so we
> > : don't have to 'descuss' it all over again, please. And the rest of you,
> > : just read it, and shutup.
> > There is clearly demonstrated problem with a flood ping and its
> > "not a bug". I am afraid we are developing the same attitude as
> > Gates & Co.
> >
> Well I assume he's F***** off with the subject (still). Anyway, I can
> see that having the loopback device not allow you to flood it with
> packets could be a good thing, as long as more reasonable spaced packets
> arn't effected in any way, but I suspect that it just can't handle the
> load, and drops packets.
>
> > How do I get my IRCD running again? Going back to 1.2.13 for good?
> >
> Ok, you don't want to go back to 1.2.13, but don't someone say to use
> pipes (or was that unix domain sockets) ?
> Bryn
> PS Gates, bar humbug
> --
> PGP key available from any good server \ Overload -- core meltdown sequence
> 1024/EB275221 1995/09/05 Bryn P. A. Jones | initiated.
> <bpaj@gytha.demon.co.uk> (use this key) / This space is intentionally left
> fingerprint: 83 AF D8 65 BC 52 74 31 | blank, apart from this text ;-)
> 67 1A 5F 31 F5 A0 9C 82 \____________________________________
>
>