Re: Linux isn't an operating system

Richard Stallman (rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu)
Thu, 7 Mar 1996 15:16:46 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Albert Cahalan: "Re: Blind-access patch for Linux 1.3.x"
Previous message: John Betts: "Linux is not an excuse for a Political Campaign"
Next in thread: Janne Sinkkonen: "Re: Linux isn't an operating system"
Reply: Janne Sinkkonen: "Re: Linux isn't an operating system"

And it is also
right that a computer running Linux should be called a Linux system as
well as a computer running Windows 95 is a Windows 95 system. It is
just a little unfair.

I think Windows 95 includes a lot besides the kernel. Aren't there
tools such as the program manager and file manager, and many DLLs?

Next message: Albert Cahalan: "Re: Blind-access patch for Linux 1.3.x"
Previous message: John Betts: "Linux is not an excuse for a Political Campaign"
Next in thread: Janne Sinkkonen: "Re: Linux isn't an operating system"
Reply: Janne Sinkkonen: "Re: Linux isn't an operating system"