Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions

From: Bart Van Assche
Date: Tue Mar 26 2024 - 13:20:29 EST


On 3/26/24 01:32, Avri Altman wrote:
@@ -992,10 +976,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_is_hba_active);
u32 ufshcd_get_local_unipro_ver(struct ufs_hba *hba)
{
- /* HCI version 1.0 and 1.1 supports UniPro 1.41 */
- if (hba->ufs_version <= ufshci_version(1, 1))
- return UFS_UNIPRO_VER_1_41;
- else
return UFS_UNIPRO_VER_1_6;
}

Please fix the indentation of the only remaining return statement in
this function.

@@ -5565,15 +5524,13 @@ void ufshcd_compl_one_cqe(struct ufs_hba *hba, int task_tag,
ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd(hba, lrbp);
/* Do not touch lrbp after scsi done */
scsi_done(cmd);
- } else if (lrbp->command_type == UTP_CMD_TYPE_DEV_MANAGE ||
- lrbp->command_type == UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE) {
- if (hba->dev_cmd.complete) {
- if (cqe) {
- ocs = le32_to_cpu(cqe->status) & MASK_OCS;
- lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->header.ocs = ocs;
- }
- complete(hba->dev_cmd.complete);
+ } else {
+ WARN_ON(!hba->dev_cmd.complete);
+ if (cqe) {
+ ocs = le32_to_cpu(cqe->status) & MASK_OCS;
+ lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->header.ocs = ocs;
}
+ complete(hba->dev_cmd.complete);
}
}

The above is a functional change that has not been mentioned in the
patch description. Please undo the functional change or explain in the
patch description why this is considered correct.

Thanks,

Bart.