Re: [PATCH RESEND] kernel: replace seq_puts by seq_putc

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Tue Mar 26 2024 - 12:10:30 EST


On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 22:28:29 +0300
Maxim Moskalets <maximmosk4@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Using seq_putc for single characters is faster and more appropriate
> than seq_puts, since only one character is passed and there is no need
> to use a more powerful and less fast function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Moskalets <Maxim.Moskalets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 6 +++---
> kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 2 +-
> kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 4 ++--
> kernel/bpf/local_storage.c | 4 ++--
> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 2 +-
> kernel/cgroup/debug.c | 6 +++---
> kernel/latencytop.c | 2 +-
> kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> kernel/module/procfs.c | 4 ++--
> kernel/module/tracking.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/cpuacct.c | 4 ++--
> kernel/sched/debug.c | 14 +++++++-------
> kernel/time/test_udelay.c | 2 +-
> kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c | 8 ++++----
> kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c | 4 ++--
> 16 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>

It's probably better to break this up per sub-system and send them out as
separate patches. At least that way the maintainers of the subsystems can
take the patch. Otherwise, nobody is going to take ownership of this.

-- Steve


> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c