Re: [PATCH 6.8 000/710] 6.8.2-rc2 review

[Daniel Díaz]

Hello!

On 25/03/24 6:00 a. m., Sasha Levin wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.8.2 release.
> There are 710 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed Mar 27 12:00:13 PM UTC 2024.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>          https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-6.8.y&id2=v6.8.1
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>          git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.8.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> Thanks,
> Sasha

There is a build regression on SPARC with allmodconfig, with GCC 8 and GCC 11. These are the first error messages:

-----8<-----
  /builds/linux/arch/sparc/kernel/traps_64.c:253:6: error: no previous prototype for 'is_no_fault_exception' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
    253 | bool is_no_fault_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
        |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  /builds/linux/arch/sparc/kernel/traps_64.c:2035:6: error: no previous prototype for 'do_mcd_err' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
   2035 | void do_mcd_err(struct pt_regs *regs, struct sun4v_error_entry ent)
        |      ^~~~~~~~~~
  /builds/linux/arch/sparc/kernel/traps_64.c:2153:6: error: no previous prototype for 'sun4v_nonresum_error_user_handled' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
   2153 | bool sun4v_nonresum_error_user_handled(struct pt_regs *regs,
        |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
----->8-----

More information (complete logs, binaries, kernel config, etc.) here:

  https://tuxapi.tuxsuite.com/v1/groups/linaro/projects/lkft/builds/2eDAKInwlwcpYzt67s8SukhrZEZ

Reproducer:

  tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch sparc --toolchain gcc-11 --kconfig allmodconfig

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx