[PATCH 6.8 205/715] pwm: dwc: use pm_sleep_ptr() macro

[Sasha Levin]

From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 7cfce2b80d5ff7aa713a7710bfe3a562707cb226 ]

Since we don't have runtime PM handles here, we should be using
pm_sleep_ptr() macro, so that the compiler can discard it in case
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n.

Fixes: 30b5b066fa83 ("pwm: dwc: Use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS for PM functions")
Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212130247.9985-2-raag.jadav@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c
index 4929354f8cd95..a4a057ae03ea2 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static struct pci_driver dwc_pwm_driver = {
 	.remove = dwc_pwm_remove,
 	.id_table = dwc_pwm_id_table,
 	.driver = {
-		.pm = pm_ptr(&dwc_pwm_pm_ops),
+		.pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&dwc_pwm_pm_ops),
 	},
 };
 
-- 
2.43.0