Re: [PATCH v3] kunit: tool: add ability to parse multiple files

[Daniel Latypov]

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 2:29 PM Rae Moar <rmoar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add ability to parse multiple files. Additionally add the
> ability to parse all results in the KUnit debugfs repository.
>
> How to parse multiple files:
>
> ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse results.log results2.log
>
> How to parse all files in directory:
>
> ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse directory_path/*
>
> How to parse KUnit debugfs repository:
>
> ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse debugfs
>
> For each file, the parser outputs the file name, results, and test
> summary. At the end of all parsing, the parser outputs a total summary
> line.
>
> This feature can be easily tested on the tools/testing/kunit/test_data/
> directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - Fixed bug with input from command line. I changed this to use
>   input(). Daniel, let me know if this works for you.

Oops, sorry for the delay.

Hmm, it seems to be treating the stdin lines like file names

$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse <
/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_config_printk_time.log
File path: Could not find  [    0.060000] printk: console [mc-1] enabled

Oh, I see, we're prompting the user via
  input("File path: ")
?

I'm not necessarily against such a change, but I would personally
prefer the old behavior of being able to read ktap from stdin
directly.
As a user, I'd also prefer to only type out filenames as arguments
where I can get autocomplete, so `input()` here wouldn't help me
personally.

Applying a hackish patch like this [1] on top gets the behavior I'd
personally expect:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse <
/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_config_printk_time.log
/dev/stdin
..
[16:01:50] Testing complete. Ran 10 tests: passed: 10

I'd mentioned in the previous version that we could have parsed files
contain a `Union[str, TextIO]` and then read from the `sys.stdin` file
object directly.
But having it blindly open `/dev/stdin` seems to work just the same,
if we want to keep our list simpler and just hold strings.

[1] this just also re-orders the `os.path.isdir()` check as mentioned
below, which simplifies things
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
index 1aa3d736d80c..311d107bd684 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
@@ -515,18 +515,18 @@ def parse_handler(cli_args: argparse.Namespace) -> None:
        total_test = kunit_parser.Test()
        total_test.status = kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS
        if not parsed_files:
-               parsed_files.append(input("File path: "))
-
-       if parsed_files[0] == "debugfs" and len(parsed_files) == 1:
+               parsed_files.append('/dev/stdin')
+       elif len(parsed_files) == 1 and parsed_files[0] == "debugfs":
                parsed_files.pop()
                for (root, _, files) in os.walk("/sys/kernel/debug/kunit"):
                        parsed_files.extend(os.path.join(root, f) for
f in files if f == "results")
-
-       if not parsed_files:
-               print("No files found.")
+               if not parsed_files:
+                       print("No files found.")

        for file in parsed_files:
-               if os.path.isfile(file):
+               if os.path.isdir(file):
+                       print("Ignoring directory ", file)
+               elif os.path.exists(file):
                        print(file)
                        with open(file, 'r', errors='backslashreplace') as f:
                                kunit_output = f.read().splitlines()
@@ -536,8 +536,6 @@ def parse_handler(cli_args: argparse.Namespace) -> None:
                                                        json=cli_args.json)
                        _, test = parse_tests(request, metadata, kunit_output)
                        total_test.subtests.append(test)
-               elif os.path.isdir(file):
-                       print("Ignoring directory ", file)
                else:
                        print("Could not find ", file)


> - Add more specific warning messages
>
>  tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> index bc74088c458a..1aa3d736d80c 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> @@ -511,19 +511,42 @@ def exec_handler(cli_args: argparse.Namespace) -> None:
>
>
>  def parse_handler(cli_args: argparse.Namespace) -> None:
> -       if cli_args.file is None:
> -               sys.stdin.reconfigure(errors='backslashreplace')  # type: ignore
> -               kunit_output = sys.stdin  # type: Iterable[str]
> -       else:
> -               with open(cli_args.file, 'r', errors='backslashreplace') as f:
> -                       kunit_output = f.read().splitlines()
> -       # We know nothing about how the result was created!
> -       metadata = kunit_json.Metadata()
> -       request = KunitParseRequest(raw_output=cli_args.raw_output,
> -                                       json=cli_args.json)
> -       result, _ = parse_tests(request, metadata, kunit_output)
> -       if result.status != KunitStatus.SUCCESS:
> -               sys.exit(1)
> +       parsed_files = cli_args.files # type: List[str]
> +       total_test = kunit_parser.Test()
> +       total_test.status = kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS
> +       if not parsed_files:
> +               parsed_files.append(input("File path: "))
> +
> +       if parsed_files[0] == "debugfs" and len(parsed_files) == 1:
> +               parsed_files.pop()
> +               for (root, _, files) in os.walk("/sys/kernel/debug/kunit"):
> +                       parsed_files.extend(os.path.join(root, f) for f in files if f == "results")
> +
> +       if not parsed_files:
> +               print("No files found.")
> +
> +       for file in parsed_files:
> +               if os.path.isfile(file):

Note: perhaps we should reorder this to

if os.path.isdir(file):
   ...
elif os.path.exists(file):
  ...

That way this code will then start handling non-regular, yet readable
files, like links, etc.
That would also help out if we started passing in the magic
"/dev/stdin" (since it's a symlink)

> +                       print(file)
> +                       with open(file, 'r', errors='backslashreplace') as f:
> +                               kunit_output = f.read().splitlines()
> +                       # We know nothing about how the result was created!
> +                       metadata = kunit_json.Metadata()
> +                       request = KunitParseRequest(raw_output=cli_args.raw_output,
> +                                                       json=cli_args.json)
> +                       _, test = parse_tests(request, metadata, kunit_output)
> +                       total_test.subtests.append(test)
> +               elif os.path.isdir(file):
> +                       print("Ignoring directory ", file)

minor nit: `print()` will automatically put a space between arguments, e.g.
> Ignoring directory  .
is what it'll print if I run `kunit.py parse .`

It might be better to use a f-string so put quotes around it, like so
  print(f'Ignoring directory "{file}"')}
and below,
  print(f'Could not find "{file}"')

> +               else:
> +                       print("Could not find ", file)
> +
> +       if len(parsed_files) > 1: # if more than one file was parsed output total summary
> +               print('All files parsed.')
> +               if not request.raw_output:
> +                       stdout.print_with_timestamp(kunit_parser.DIVIDER)
> +                       kunit_parser.bubble_up_test_results(total_test)
> +                       kunit_parser.print_summary_line(total_test)
>
>
>  subcommand_handlers_map = {
> @@ -569,9 +592,10 @@ def main(argv: Sequence[str]) -> None:
>                                             help='Parses KUnit results from a file, '
>                                             'and parses formatted results')
>         add_parse_opts(parse_parser)
> -       parse_parser.add_argument('file',
> -                                 help='Specifies the file to read results from.',
> -                                 type=str, nargs='?', metavar='input_file')
> +       parse_parser.add_argument('files',
> +                                 help='List of file paths to read results from or keyword'
> +                                               '"debugfs" to read all results from the debugfs directory.',

minor spacing note: there are two ' 's here in the series of tabs, i.e.
  ^I^I^I^I  ^I^I'"debugfs" to read all results from the debugfs directory.',$
(using vim's :list formatting)

This was copy-pasted from the lines above and below which look like
  ^I^I^I^I  help='List of file paths to read results from or keyword'$
i.e. they use the 2 spaces to align after the tabs.

We can just drop those 2 spaces since they won't visually affect the
outcome with a tabwidth of 8 spaces.

Sorry again for the delayed reply,
Daniel