Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: driver and doc updates

[Miquel Raynal]

> >> I'm sorry for not thinking about this ahead of time, I was also not
> >> Cced on the other patches, I noticed it (told Willliam) and just forgot
> >> about this when I applied the series.
> >>
> >> It is currently living in -next so if there is any problem I can still
> >> act.
> >>
> >> However for this kind of change I usually apply the bindings and .c
> >> changes independently from the DT patches. I believe there is no
> >> problem having one or the other being merged first, or do I overlook
> >> something?  
> > 
> > What the heck /o\ I just understand now my mistake, I am very truly
> > sorry for that...
> > 
> > You were telling me I should sync with you before taking DT changes,
> > and I was so convinced I _did_not_ take the DT, when I looked at the
> > branch I did not understand your point. But I am totally sorry I
> > actually did take the DTs by mistake and I truly did not notice it.
> > Confirmation bias I suppose. My very sincere apologies.
> > 
> > As mentioned previously, I was not CC'ed on the DT patches, but I
> > believe the linux-mtd list was, so the patches didn't appear in my
> > inbox, and once I was happy with the binding/driver changes I applied
> > it all without noticing the DT changes had sneaked in.
> > 
> > I'm finally preparing the PR for Linus and I see it now...
> > 
> > I believe the SoC tree is closed now so it's up to you what I should do
> > with them. Let me know if you want me to keep them in my tree and
> > forward them to Linus or if I should drop them and you'll take them for
> > the next cycle. Also, if I keep them, shall I add some tag of yours on
> > these 3 patches? For the record I did not review them.  
> 
> Yes please add my:
> 
> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> tag, and it's fine I don't expect that we will get conflicts for those files.
> 
> > 
> > Thanks and again, I'm confused. I never apply DT patches like that,
> > your initial remark was more than legitimate.  
> 
> Not a problem!

Thanks :-)

Miquèl