Re: [PATCH v19 019/130] KVM: x86: Add is_vm_type_supported callback

[Chao Gao]

>-static bool kvm_is_vm_type_supported(unsigned long type)
>+bool __kvm_is_vm_type_supported(unsigned long type)
> {
> 	return type == KVM_X86_DEFAULT_VM ||
> 	       (type == KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM &&
> 		IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_SW_PROTECTED_VM) && tdp_enabled);

maybe just do:
	switch (type) {
	case KVM_X86_DEFAULT_VM:
		return true;
	case KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM:
		return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_SW_PROTECTED_VM) && tdp_enabled;
	default:
		return static_call(kvm_x86_is_vm_type_supported)(type);
	}

There are two benefits
1) switch/case improves readability a little.
2) no need to expose __kvm_is_vm_type_supported()


> }
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_is_vm_type_supported);

>+
>+static bool kvm_is_vm_type_supported(unsigned long type)
>+{
>+	return static_call(kvm_x86_is_vm_type_supported)(type);
>+}
> 
> int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> {
>@@ -4784,6 +4790,10 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> 		r = BIT(KVM_X86_DEFAULT_VM);
> 		if (kvm_is_vm_type_supported(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM))
> 			r |= BIT(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM);
>+		if (kvm_is_vm_type_supported(KVM_X86_TDX_VM))
>+			r |= BIT(KVM_X86_TDX_VM);
>+		if (kvm_is_vm_type_supported(KVM_X86_SNP_VM))
>+			r |= BIT(KVM_X86_SNP_VM);

maybe use a for-loop?