Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] dmaengine: bcm2835: Fix several spellos

From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Wed Mar 13 2024 - 13:02:48 EST


On 3/13/24 08:26, Andrea della Porta wrote:
On 08:00 Wed 13 Mar , Florian Fainelli wrote:


On 3/13/2024 7:08 AM, Andrea della Porta wrote:
Fixed Codespell reported warnings about spelling and coding convention
violations, among which there are also a couple potential operator
precedence issue in macroes.

and s/macroes/macros/


Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@xxxxxxxx>

There are no spelling errors being fixed in this commit, this is purely
stylistic and conforming to the Linux coding style guidelines.

- /* detect a size missmatch */
- if (buf_len && (d->size != buf_len))
+ /* detect a size mismatch */
+ if (buf_len && d->size != buf_len)

Isn't 'missmatch' a spelling error? Maybe I can drop the word 'several', since it's
indeed only one...

Can we agree this was easy to miss when 99% of the changes are stylistic? The summary is that the commit subject and the message are not describing what this patch is about.
--
Florian

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature