[PATCH v2 03/15] sched/core: Fix priority checking for DL server picks

From: Joel Fernandes (Google)
Date: Tue Mar 12 2024 - 21:25:50 EST


In core scheduling, a DL server pick (which is CFS task) should be given higher
priority than tasks in other classes.

Not doing so causes CFS starvation. A kselftest is added later to demonstrate
this. A CFS task that is competing with RT tasks can be completely starved
without this and the DL server's boosting completely ignored.

Fix these problems.

Reviewed-by: Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 63f41453b79e..0a05caf9d3d7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ static inline int __task_prio(const struct task_struct *p)
if (p->sched_class == &stop_sched_class) /* trumps deadline */
return -2;

+ if (p->dl_server)
+ return -1; /* deadline */
+
if (rt_prio(p->prio)) /* includes deadline */
return p->prio; /* [-1, 99] */

@@ -191,8 +194,24 @@ static inline bool prio_less(const struct task_struct *a,
if (-pb < -pa)
return false;

- if (pa == -1) /* dl_prio() doesn't work because of stop_class above */
- return !dl_time_before(a->dl.deadline, b->dl.deadline);
+ if (pa == -1) { /* dl_prio() doesn't work because of stop_class above */
+ const struct sched_dl_entity *a_dl, *b_dl;
+
+ a_dl = &a->dl;
+ /*
+ * Since,'a' and 'b' can be CFS tasks served by DL server,
+ * __task_prio() can return -1 (for DL) even for those. In that
+ * case, get to the dl_server's DL entity.
+ */
+ if (a->dl_server)
+ a_dl = a->dl_server;
+
+ b_dl = &b->dl;
+ if (b->dl_server)
+ b_dl = b->dl_server;
+
+ return !dl_time_before(a_dl->deadline, b_dl->deadline);
+ }

if (pa == MAX_RT_PRIO + MAX_NICE) /* fair */
return cfs_prio_less(a, b, in_fi);
--
2.34.1