Re: linux-next: manual merge of the edac tree with the jc_docs tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:20:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the edac tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   Documentation/index.rst
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   9ee367809c67 ("docs: Include simplified link titles in main index")
> 
> from the jc_docs tree and commits:
> 
>   1289c431641f ("Documentation: RAS: Add index and address translation section")
>   0e4fd816b08e ("Documentation: Move RAS section to admin-guide")
> 
> from the edac tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> 
> diff --cc Documentation/index.rst
> index 429a407470c8,9dfdc826618c..000000000000
> --- a/Documentation/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/index.rst
> @@@ -112,8 -112,7 +112,7 @@@ to ReStructured Text format, or are sim
>   .. toctree::
>      :maxdepth: 1
>   
>  -   staging/index
>  +   Unsorted documentation <staging/index>
> -    RAS/ras
>   
>   
>   Translations

This is now a conflict between the jc_docs tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpkk7KpdzGB5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature