Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/mm: Use IPIs to synchronize LAM enablement

[Borislav Petkov]

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 09:46:07AM -0700, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> Thanks for sharing that. I have always assumed this was about pinging
> or resending patches when reviews are taking too long. In this case, I
> was responding to review comments. Maybe I misinterpreted that.

So what I would do, for example, is send my set, collect review
comments, work them in, discuss them and once there are no more, I'll do
a rev+1, test and send again. Not under a week unless it is some really
serious bug.

This is a perfectly fine cadence.

> Anyway, sending a new version in the same day is too fast regardless.
> I did admit that already. My bad again :)

No worries. I'm saying this also for all the others who are reading. :-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette