On Tue, 2024-03-12 at 11:38 +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
I am once again calling for this patch to be reverted on the net-next tree
on the basis of:
- This patch did not go through a proper reviewing process. There are
proposed changes on the code it changes regarding the scope and the
method of the patch, and improvements to be made on the patch log.
- This patch should be backported to stable releases, therefore it
shouldn't be on the net-next tree and should be submitted to the net tree
instead.
The net-next pull request is out:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240312042504.1835743-1-kuba@xxxxxxxxxx/
at this point I believe we can't retract it unless there is a very
serious regression affecting most/all users. This does not look such
case.
I think the better option is follow-up on net with follow-up fixes if
any.
All the relevant patches could be sent to the stable tree later:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst#L47
To try to reduce the possibilities of this kind of situation in the
future, may I kindly ask you to invest some more little time to help
the reviewers and the maintainers? e.g. trimming the replies explicitly
cutting all the unneeded parts in the quoted code/text would make the
whole conversation much easier to follow (at least to me). The netdev
volume is insane, it's very easy to get lost in a given thread and miss
relevant part of it.