Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the mm tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:32:00 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   init/main.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   4728b74d1992 ("arm64, powerpc, riscv, s390, x86: ptdump: refactor CONFIG_DEBUG_WX")
> 
> from the mm-unstable branch of the mm tree and commit:
> 
>   193d98b1d3aa ("pidfd: add pidfs")
> 
> from the vfs-brauner tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc init/main.c
> index bc3b6b49b3d8,2fbf6a3114d5..000000000000
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@@ -100,7 -99,7 +100,8 @@@
>   #include <linux/init_syscalls.h>
>   #include <linux/stackdepot.h>
>   #include <linux/randomize_kstack.h>
>  +#include <linux/ptdump.h>
> + #include <linux/pidfs.h>
>   #include <net/net_namespace.h>
>   
>   #include <asm/io.h>

This is now a conflict between the mm-stable tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpqI49PoZzEY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature