Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ASoC: fsl: imx-rpmsg: Update to correct DT node

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Mon Mar 11 2024 - 03:48:42 EST


On 11/03/2024 08:33, Chancel Liu wrote:
>>> @@ -127,6 +126,22 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>>> goto fail;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if (!strcmp(pdev->dev.platform_data, "rpmsg-micfil-channel"))
>>> + np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "rpmsg_micfil");
>>> + else
>>> + np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "rpmsg_audio");
>>
>> Why do you create ABI on node names? Where is it documented? Why can't
>> you use phandles?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
> Thanks for your reminder. Truly I shouldn't use undocumented bindings. I will
> use “fsl,rpmsg-channel-name” to refine patch set. Please help review next
> version.

Instead of hard-coding node names in the driver you want to put it in
"fsl,rpmsg-channel-name" property? I don't follow. I recommended instead
using phandles, care to address that?

Best regards,
Krzysztof