Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/packet: Add getsockopt support for PACKET_COPY_THRESH

From: Jason Xing
Date: Fri Mar 08 2024 - 08:12:01 EST


On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 8:56 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 1:43 PM Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlookcom> wrote:
> >
> > Currently getsockopt does not support PACKET_COPY_THRESH,
> > and we are unable to get the value of PACKET_COPY_THRESH
> > socket option through getsockopt.
> >
> > This patch adds getsockopt support for PACKET_COPY_THRESH.
> >
> > In addition, this patch converts access to copy_thresh to
> > READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > V1 -> V2: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE.
> >
> > net/packet/af_packet.c | 7 +++++--
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> > index 0db31ca4982d..61270826b9ac 100644
> > --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> > +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> > @@ -2318,7 +2318,7 @@ static int tpacket_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> > }
> > if (po->tp_version <= TPACKET_V2) {
> > if (macoff + snaplen > po->rx_ring.frame_size) {
> > - if (po->copy_thresh &&
> > + if (READ_ONCE(po->copy_thresh) &&
> > atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) < sk->sk_rcvbuf) {
> > if (skb_shared(skb)) {
> > copy_skb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > @@ -3836,7 +3836,7 @@ packet_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, sockptr_t optval,
> > if (copy_from_sockptr(&val, optval, sizeof(val)))
> > return -EFAULT;
> >
> > - pkt_sk(sk)->copy_thresh = val;
> > + WRITE_ONCE(pkt_sk(sk)->copy_thresh, val);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > case PACKET_VERSION:
> > @@ -4090,6 +4090,9 @@ static int packet_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
> > case PACKET_VNET_HDR_SZ:
> > val = READ_ONCE(po->vnet_hdr_sz);
> > break;
> > + case PACKET_COPY_THRESH:
> > + val = READ_ONCE(pkt_sk(sk)->copy_thresh);
> > + break;
> > case PACKET_VERSION:
> > val = po->tp_version;
> > break;
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >
>
> I think you forgot to change net/packet/diag.c pdiag_put_info()
>

Ah, he updated his patch so soon even without taking a break.

I just replied to the v1 thread with three changes made.

Juntong, you could check your v1 patch thread and you will see the
missing point.

Thanks,
Jason