[PATCH 01/10] sched/balancing: Switch the 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK(balancing)' spinlock into an 'atomic_t sched_balance_running' flag

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Mar 08 2024 - 05:59:59 EST


The 'balancing' spinlock added in:

08c183f31bdb ("[PATCH] sched: add option to serialize load balancing")

.. is taken when the SD_SERIALIZE flag is set in a domain, but in reality it
is a glorified global atomic flag serializing the load-balancing of
those domains.

It doesn't have any explicit locking semantics per se: we just
spin_trylock() it.

Turn it into a ... global atomic flag. This makes it more
clear what is going on here, and reduces overhead and code
size a bit:

# kernel/sched/fair.o: [x86-64 defconfig]

text data bss dec hex filename
60730 2721 104 63555 f843 fair.o.before
60718 2721 104 63543 f837 fair.o.after

Also document the flag a bit.

No change in functionality intended.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6a16129f9a5c..2ef89b36aed1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -11633,7 +11633,20 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data)
return 0;
}

-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(balancing);
+/*
+ * This flag serializes load-balancing passes over large domains
+ * (above the NODE topology level) - only one load-balancing instance
+ * may run at a time, to reduce overhead on very large systems with
+ * lots of CPUs and large NUMA distances.
+ *
+ * - Note that load-balancing passes triggered while another one
+ * is executing are skipped and not re-tried.
+ *
+ * - Also note that this does not serialize rebalance_domains()
+ * execution, as non-SD_SERIALIZE domains will still be
+ * load-balanced in parallel.
+ */
+static atomic_t sched_balance_running = ATOMIC_INIT(0);

/*
* Scale the max load_balance interval with the number of CPUs in the system.
@@ -11711,7 +11724,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)

need_serialize = sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE;
if (need_serialize) {
- if (!spin_trylock(&balancing))
+ if (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&sched_balance_running, 0, 1))
goto out;
}

@@ -11729,7 +11742,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
interval = get_sd_balance_interval(sd, busy);
}
if (need_serialize)
- spin_unlock(&balancing);
+ atomic_set_release(&sched_balance_running, 0);
out:
if (time_after(next_balance, sd->last_balance + interval)) {
next_balance = sd->last_balance + interval;
--
2.40.1