Re: [PATCH 26/30] sched: handle preempt=voluntary under PREEMPT_AUTO

[Joel Fernandes]

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 10:49 PM Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>

> The PREEMPT_AUTO, preempt=none policy in this series will always
> cause preemption to be at user exit or the next tick. Seems like
> it would be worse for higher scheduling classes more often.

Ok, sounds good. I believe we are on the same page then.

Thanks.