Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] perf: imx_perf: add support for i.MX95 platform

From: Frank Li
Date: Thu Mar 07 2024 - 17:45:57 EST

Next message: Reinette Chatre: "Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] x86/resctrl : Support AMD Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC)"
Previous message: Yosry Ahmed: "Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86/mm: make sure LAM is up-to-date during context switching"
In reply to: Frank Li: "Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] perf: imx_perf: add support for i.MX95 platform"
Next in thread: Xu Yang: "[PATCH v6 7/7] perf vendor events arm64:: Add i.MX95 DDR Performance Monitor metrics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 12:05:42PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 05:57:29PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote:
> > i.MX95 has a DDR PMU which is almostly same as i.MX93, it now supports
> > read beat and write beat filter capabilities. This will add support for
> > i.MX95 and enhance the driver to support specific filter handling for it.
> >
> > Usage:
> >
> > For read beat:
> > ~# perf stat -a -I 1000 -e imx9_ddr0/eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt2,axi_mask=ID_MASK,axi_id=ID/
> > ~# perf stat -a -I 1000 -e imx9_ddr0/eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt1,axi_mask=ID_MASK,axi_id=ID/
> > ~# perf stat -a -I 1000 -e imx9_ddr0/eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt0,axi_mask=ID_MASK,axi_id=ID/
> > eg: For edma2: perf stat -a -I 1000 -e imx9_ddr0/eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt0,axi_mask=0x00f,axi_id=0x00c/
> >
> > For write beat:
> > ~# perf stat -a -I 1000 -e imx9_ddr0/eddrtq_pm_wr_beat_filt,axi_mask=ID_MASK,axi_id=ID/
> > eg: For edma2: perf stat -a -I 1000 -e imx9_ddr0/eddrtq_pm_wr_beat_filt,axi_mask=0x00f,axi_id=0x00c/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - put soc spefific axi filter events to drvdata according
> > to franks suggestions.
> > - adjust pmcfg axi_id and axi_mask config
> > Changes in v3:
> > - no changes
> > Changes in v4:
> > - only contain imx95 parts
> > Changes in v5:
> > - improve imx95_ddr_perf_monitor_config()
> > - use write_relaxed to pair read_relaxed
> > Changes in v6:
> > - no changes
> > ---
> > drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> > index 52234b97d0cb..a91267e2f5d8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> > @@ -17,9 +17,19 @@
> > #define MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN BIT(29)
> > #define MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK GENMASK(17, 0)
> >
> > +#define MX95_PMCFG1_WR_BEAT_FILT_EN BIT(31)
> > +#define MX95_PMCFG1_RD_BEAT_FILT_EN BIT(30)
> > +
> > #define PMCFG2 0x04
> > #define MX93_PMCFG2_ID GENMASK(17, 0)
> >
> > +#define PMCFG3 0x08
> > +#define PMCFG4 0x0C
> > +#define PMCFG5 0x10
> > +#define PMCFG6 0x14
> > +#define MX95_PMCFG_ID_MASK GENMASK(9, 0)
> > +#define MX95_PMCFG_ID GENMASK(25, 16)
> > +
> > /* Global control register affects all counters and takes priority over local control registers */
> > #define PMGC0 0x40
> > /* Global control register bits */
> > @@ -77,13 +87,23 @@ static const struct imx_ddr_devtype_data imx93_devtype_data = {
> > .identifier = "imx93",
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct imx_ddr_devtype_data imx95_devtype_data = {
> > + .identifier = "imx95",
> > +};
> > +
> > static inline bool is_imx93(struct ddr_pmu *pmu)
> > {
> > return pmu->devtype_data == &imx93_devtype_data;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline bool is_imx95(struct ddr_pmu *pmu)
> > +{
> > + return pmu->devtype_data == &imx95_devtype_data;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct of_device_id imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids[] = {
> > - {.compatible = "fsl,imx93-ddr-pmu", .data = &imx93_devtype_data},
> > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx93-ddr-pmu", .data = &imx93_devtype_data },
> > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx95-ddr-pmu", .data = &imx95_devtype_data },
> > { /* sentinel */ }
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids);
> > @@ -192,6 +212,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_ld_wiq_7, ID(2, 71)),
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_empty, ID(2, 72)),
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_trans_filt, ID(2, 73)), /* imx93 specific*/
> > + IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_wr_beat_filt, ID(2, 73)), /* imx95 specific*/
> >
> > /* counter3 specific events */
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_0, ID(3, 64)),
> > @@ -204,6 +225,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_7, ID(3, 71)),
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_full, ID(3, 72)),
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_wr_trans_filt, ID(3, 73)), /* imx93 specific*/
> > + IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt2, ID(3, 73)), /* imx95 specific*/
> >
> > /* counter4 specific events */
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_0, ID(4, 64)),
> > @@ -216,6 +238,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_7, ID(4, 71)),
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_ld_rdq2_rmw, ID(4, 72)),
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt, ID(4, 73)), /* imx93 specific*/
> > + IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt1, ID(4, 73)), /* imx95 specific*/
> >
> > /* counter5 specific events */
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_valid_start_0, ID(5, 64)),
> > @@ -227,6 +250,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_valid_start_6, ID(5, 70)),
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_valid_start_7, ID(5, 71)),
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_ld_rdq1, ID(5, 72)),
> > + IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt0, ID(5, 73)), /* imx95 specific*/
> >
> > /* counter6 specific events */
> > IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_valid_end_0, ID(6, 64)),
> > @@ -263,6 +287,13 @@ ddr_perf_events_attrs_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> > !is_imx93(ddr_pmu))
> > return 0;
> >
> > + if ((!strcmp(attr->name, "eddrtq_pm_wr_beat_filt") ||
> > + !strcmp(attr->name, "eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt2") ||
> > + !strcmp(attr->name, "eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt1") ||
> > + !strcmp(attr->name, "eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt0")) &&
> > + !is_imx95(ddr_pmu))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > return attr->mode;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -434,6 +465,57 @@ static void imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int event,
> > writel_relaxed(pmcfg2, pmu->base + PMCFG2);
> > }
> >
> > +static void imx95_ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int event,
> > + int counter, int axi_id, int axi_mask)
> > +{
> > + u32 pmcfg1, pmcfg, offset = 0;
> > +
> > + pmcfg1 = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMCFG1);
> > +
> > + if (event == 73) {
> > + switch (counter) {
> > + case 2:
> > + pmcfg1 |= MX95_PMCFG1_WR_BEAT_FILT_EN;
> > + offset = PMCFG3;
> > + break;
> > + case 3:
> > + pmcfg1 |= MX95_PMCFG1_RD_BEAT_FILT_EN;
> > + offset = PMCFG4;
> > + break;
> > + case 4:
> > + pmcfg1 |= MX95_PMCFG1_RD_BEAT_FILT_EN;
> > + offset = PMCFG5;
> > + break;
> > + case 5:
> > + pmcfg1 |= MX95_PMCFG1_RD_BEAT_FILT_EN;
> > + offset = PMCFG6;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + switch (counter) {
> > + case 2:
> > + pmcfg1 &= ~MX95_PMCFG1_WR_BEAT_FILT_EN;
> > + break;
> > + case 3:
> > + case 4:
> > + case 5:
> > + pmcfg1 &= ~MX95_PMCFG1_RD_BEAT_FILT_EN;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> Look like only if event = 73, FILTER need be set.
>
> How about
>
> pmcfg1 &= ~(MX95_PMCFG1_WR_BEAT_FILT_EN | MX95_PMCFG1_RD_BEAT_FILT_EN);
> if (event == 73)
> switch()
> ...
>
> So you need "else" branch.

Forget this one. My code have problem.

Frank

>
>
> > +
> > + writel_relaxed(pmcfg1, pmu->base + PMCFG1);
> > +
> > + if (offset) {
> > + pmcfg = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + offset);
> > + pmcfg &= ~(FIELD_PREP(MX95_PMCFG_ID_MASK, 0x3FF) |
> > + FIELD_PREP(MX95_PMCFG_ID, 0x3FF));
> > + pmcfg |= (FIELD_PREP(MX95_PMCFG_ID_MASK, axi_mask) |
> > + FIELD_PREP(MX95_PMCFG_ID, axi_id));
> > + writel_relaxed(pmcfg, pmu->base + offset);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static void ddr_perf_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
> > {
> > struct ddr_pmu *pmu = to_ddr_pmu(event->pmu);
> > @@ -543,8 +625,13 @@ static int ddr_perf_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> > hwc->idx = counter;
> > hwc->state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED;
> >
> > - /* read trans, write trans, read beat */
> > - imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, event_id, counter, cfg1, cfg2);
> > + if (is_imx93(pmu))
> > + /* read trans, write trans, read beat */
> > + imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, event_id, counter, cfg1, cfg2);
> > +
> > + if (is_imx95(pmu))
> > + /* write beat, read beat2, read beat1, read beat */
> > + imx95_ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, event_id, counter, cfg1, cfg2);
> >
> > if (flags & PERF_EF_START)
> > ddr_perf_event_start(event, flags);
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >

Next message: Reinette Chatre: "Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] x86/resctrl : Support AMD Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC)"
Previous message: Yosry Ahmed: "Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86/mm: make sure LAM is up-to-date during context switching"
In reply to: Frank Li: "Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] perf: imx_perf: add support for i.MX95 platform"
Next in thread: Xu Yang: "[PATCH v6 7/7] perf vendor events arm64:: Add i.MX95 DDR Performance Monitor metrics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]