Re: [PATCH kernel v3] PCI/DOE: Support discovery version 2

From: Alexey Kardashevskiy
Date: Thu Mar 07 2024 - 01:10:01 EST




On 7/3/24 16:06, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:

On 3/6/24 6:20 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
PCIe r6.1, sec 6.30.1.1 defines a "DOE Discovery Version" field in
the DOE Discovery Request Data Object Contents (3rd DW) as:

15:8 DOE Discovery Version – must be 02h if the Capability Version in
the Data Object Exchange Extended Capability is 02h or greater.

Does this change fix any functional issue? If yes, please add Fixes:
tag and probably CC stable?

The issue is that before this patch the DOE driver was following PCIe r6.0 and it was not working on a device with DOE cap v2 added in r6.1. Is it "fixes"?



Add support for the version on devices with the DOE v2 capability.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@xxxxxxx>
---
Change wise looks fine to me.

Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

Changes:
v3:
* updated subject line
* dropped "DISCOVER_" from the new field macro

v2:
* added the section number to the commit log
---
include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 1 +
drivers/pci/doe.c | 11 ++++++++---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
index a39193213ff2..fbca743b2b86 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
@@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@
#define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_HEADER_2_LENGTH 0x0003ffff
#define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX 0x000000ff
+#define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_VER 0x0000ff00
#define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_VID 0x0000ffff
#define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_PROTOCOL 0x00ff0000
#define PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_RSP_3_NEXT_INDEX 0xff000000
diff --git a/drivers/pci/doe.c b/drivers/pci/doe.c
index 61f0531d2b1d..c94c2b0767f3 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/doe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/doe.c
@@ -381,11 +381,13 @@ static void pci_doe_task_complete(struct pci_doe_task *task)
complete(task->private);
}
-static int pci_doe_discovery(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u8 *index, u16 *vid,
+static int pci_doe_discovery(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u8 capver, u8 *index, u16 *vid,
u8 *protocol)
{
u32 request_pl = FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX,
- *index);
+ *index) |
+ FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_VER,
+ (capver >= 2) ? 2 : 0);
__le32 request_pl_le = cpu_to_le32(request_pl);
__le32 response_pl_le;
u32 response_pl;
@@ -419,13 +421,16 @@ static int pci_doe_cache_protocols(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb)
{
u8 index = 0;
u8 xa_idx = 0;
+ u32 hdr = 0;
+
+ pci_read_config_dword(doe_mb->pdev, doe_mb->cap_offset, &hdr);
do {
int rc;
u16 vid;
u8 prot;
- rc = pci_doe_discovery(doe_mb, &index, &vid, &prot);
+ rc = pci_doe_discovery(doe_mb, PCI_EXT_CAP_VER(hdr), &index, &vid, &prot);
if (rc)
return rc;


--
Alexey